Rating member Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., speaks in the course of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and City Affairs affirmation listening to for Kevin Warsh, President Donald Trump’s nominee for chair of the Federal Reserve, within the Dirksen Senate Workplace Constructing in Washington, on April 21, 2026.
Andrew Harnik | Getty Pictures
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., is looking on the Trump administration to make clear its stance on elevating the retirement age — a transfer she stated she opposes.
In a new letter despatched to President Donald Trump on Sunday evening, Warren cited particulars from the Social Safety Administration’s newest trustees report. In late 2032 — only a bit greater than six years from now — the belief fund Social Safety depends on to pay retirement advantages will run out, in accordance with new projections within the report. At the moment, 78% of these advantages will likely be payable if lawmakers take no motion.
“Republicans have a historical past of making an attempt to extend the retirement age, privatize Social Safety, or in any other case reduce Social Safety advantages, and a few Congressional Republicans have referred to as to boost the retirement age or means-test advantages because the ‘answer’ to this drawback,” Warren wrote with Democratic Sens. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut.
Modifications to the Social Safety age thresholds can be tantamount to a profit reduce, consultants have stated.
It “hurts older Individuals, chopping month-to-month advantages and forcing tens of millions into poverty,” the lawmakers wrote.
The White Home didn’t reply to a request for touch upon the letter.
Requested final week in regards to the administration’s plans for this system, together with maybe elevating the retirement age, White Home spokesperson Liz Huston advised CNBC in an e mail that, “President Trump will all the time shield and strengthen Social Safety.”
Warren’s letter additionally comes shortly after Home Speaker Mike Johnson reportedly advised a Louisiana radio station that he intends to push ahead with a plan to deal with spending for Social Safety, Medicare and Medicaid subsequent yr.
The Republican Examine Committee, a big group of Home Republicans, had beforehand referred to as for elevating the retirement age in its price range proposal. Nevertheless, in a January press launch, the group said its newest price range “balances the books with out chopping Social Safety or Medicare advantages” or “elevating the Social Safety retirement age.”
How a better retirement age would have an effect on advantages
Thianchai Sitthikongsak | Second | Getty Pictures
Lawmakers typically could restore Social Safety’s solvency by elevating taxes, chopping advantages or a mix of each.
Elevating the retirement age can be a reduce, since folks would want to delay claiming to obtain their full month-to-month profit.
Presently, Social Safety beneficiaries obtain 100% of the advantages they’ve earned at their full retirement age. For folks born in 1960 and later, that age is 67. Elevating that bar might scale back advantages for individuals who declare at that age or earlier.
“In apply, elevating the retirement age by two years would scale back the median retiree’s month-to-month advantages by $345 to $741 — or by between 17 and 35 % — successfully chopping tens of tens of millions of Individuals’ Social Safety advantages and disproportionately falling on seniors on the decrease finish of the revenue distribution who depend on Social Safety as one among their important sources of revenue,” Warren, Duckworth and Blumenthal wrote within the letter to Trump.
Social Safety’s retirement age has regularly elevated from 65 to 67 following reforms handed by Congress in 1983. At the moment, this system confronted imminent funding points, and the age modifications had been added to the bundle to revive this system’s solvency.
Age change not a fast repair for Social Safety’s funds
Elevating the retirement age once more wouldn’t present a straightforward repair to Social Safety’s present funding woes, some consultants say.
When the retirement age was final modified, it took many years to regularly take impact, Joel Eskovitz, senior director of Social Safety and financial savings on the AARP Public Coverage Institute, stated throughout a digital briefing on Thursday in regards to the trustees report. The briefing was hosted by the Nationwide Academy of Social Insurance coverage, a nonprofit targeted on social insurance coverage coverage.
“Elevating the retirement age actually does not do something on this short-term dialog,” Eskovitz stated. “It’s a repair for a long-term drawback.”
Moreover, it is not clear that it is a “nice repair,” he stated.
Whereas Social Safety’s trustees report exhibits life expectancy growing into the long run, that won’t be skilled equally, Eskovitz stated. Individuals who are inclined to stay longer are rich and have increased ranges of training, he stated.
Elevating the retirement age may steepen the reductions claimants obtain for taking advantages early, ranging from age 62, in accordance with Eskovitz.
As a result of restoring Social Safety’s solvency will probably require a number of modifications, some consultants — together with Jason Fichtner, a senior fellow at NASI — say elevating the retirement age ought to be an choice that’s thought of. Fichtner beforehand served in roles on the Social Safety Administration, together with performing deputy commissioner and chief economist.
Nevertheless, elevating the retirement age would want to coincide with different modifications, Fichtner stated, comparable to establishing a stronger minimal profit for people who can’t work previous age 62 as a consequence of well being points or bodily demanding jobs.
Growing the retirement age wouldn’t be an instantaneous repair, however might assist this system many years from now, in accordance with Fichtner.
But any change to the retirement age might be a troublesome promote.
AARP opposes any modifications that reduce Individuals’ Social Safety funds, together with elevating the retirement age, Nancy LeaMond, chief advocacy and engagement officer, stated throughout a Could 28 media briefing.
Individuals broadly opposed profit cuts, together with elevating the retirement age, in accordance with a 2025 survey by NASI, AARP, the Nationwide Institute on Retirement Safety and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
A bunch of Senate Democrats, together with Warren, in addition to Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., proposed a invoice final yr that they stated might restore Social Safety’s solvency for 75 years and enhance advantages, whereas avoiding cuts like elevating the retirement age.
To pay for that, the proposal, often known as the Social Safety Growth Act, requires extending payroll taxes on wages, salaries and self-employment earnings for revenue over $250,000. It might additionally enhance the online funding revenue tax, and make it in order that levy applies to energetic commerce or enterprise revenue.
To maneuver ahead, the laws would want the help of Republicans, since Social Safety reform can’t be carried out via a one-party majority. Nevertheless, Republicans have largely opposed tax will increase.
The invoice has been with the Senate Finance Committee since February 2025.
