At this time’s employees coming into retirement face one large dilemma: What’s one of the simplest ways to show their nest eggs into a gradual stream of earnings?
One conventional method — the 4% rule, whereby retirees can withdraw that portion of their portfolio of their first yr of retirement after which regulate that charge for inflation thereafter — is just not essentially the perfect reply, based on new analysis by Mark Warshawsky, a senior fellow on the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative Washington assume tank, and by Gaobo Pang, an unbiased researcher.
“There’s vital danger there when it comes to outliving your property,” Warshawsky mentioned. “For individuals with typical danger aversion, that is too dangerous.”
One other “all or nothing” technique — placing all of the property into an annuity — might present greater earnings, however requires retirees to surrender management of their cash, he mentioned.
“The candy spot is principally proper smack within the center,” Warshawsky mentioned.
Shopping for a partial annuity — both placing half of financial savings into an annuity up entrance or by slowly changing property to annuities over time — can present a assured stream of earnings whereas serving to to offer for longevity, based on Warshawsky.
How a lot retirees might realistically spend
Warshawsky and Pang’s new analysis is revealed and funded by the American Council of Life Insurers. Nonetheless, the commerce affiliation for the life insurance coverage business mentioned it didn’t affect the researchers’ findings.
The analysis relies on the state of affairs of a person who retires at age 65, has $1 million in retirement financial savings and receives round $25,700 per yr in Social Safety advantages.
The research evaluates 4 primary retirement earnings methods whereas contemplating elements that will have an effect on how lengthy the cash lasts — federal earnings taxes, Medicare premiums, Social Safety claiming choices and projections for funding returns and the financial system.
At this time’s retirees face a wide range of headwinds, together with looming Social Safety funding woes, rising inflation that’s pushing up on a regular basis prices and market volatility.
As a document variety of child boomers attain the milestone age of 65, after they turn out to be eligible for Medicare, they face a retirement earnings dilemma: how a lot of their nest egg they will realistically spend.

For a hypothetical retiree with $1 million in retirement financial savings who retires at age 65 and depends completely on the 4% rule, the preliminary withdrawal could be $40,000. However whereas this technique offers essentially the most liquidity and adaptability, it additionally dangers failing to offer earnings sooner or later if a retiree lives an extended life or the markets underperform, based on Warshawsky and Pang’s analysis.
In the meantime, full annuitization gives the best preliminary earnings however is illiquid and doesn’t cowl long-term care or different wants that will come up, based on the analysis.
It discovered that partial annuitization outperforms these methods and balances three wants — regular earnings by annuities, liquidity and adaptability by invested portfolio property and the potential for cash to proceed to develop within the markets.
The analysis is modeled after a single premium instant annuity, which offers a stream of assured earnings in alternate for a lump-sum fee. Different forms of annuities might work as properly, based on Warshawsky.
‘4% is an effective back-of-the-envelope place to begin’
Allison Michael Orenstein | Getty Photographs
The 4% rule was developed by monetary planner William Bengen within the Nineteen Nineties and has turn out to be a benchmark for retirement withdrawal charges.
In his 2025 ebook, Bengen mentioned some retirees might be able to safely withdraw greater than 4%.
In December, funding analysis supplier Morningstar mentioned 3.9% is the best beginning secure withdrawal charge for retirees. Nonetheless, with a extra versatile method, retirees can withdraw as much as 5.7% of their beginning portfolio, the agency mentioned in its 2025 State of Retirement Earnings report.
“4% is an effective back-of-the-envelope place to begin,” mentioned Christine Benz, director of non-public finance and retirement planning at Morningstar.
The 4% guideline has been stress-tested throughout many various market environments, Benz mentioned.
To make sure, retirees might wish to pare again their withdrawals throughout years when markets are down or regulate for inflation, based on Benz. In good years, they can withdraw a bit extra, she mentioned.
A 4% beginning withdrawal charge with annual inflation changes has, over many durations in market historical past, been too weak and has left individuals with massive leftover balances as a result of it inspired them to underspend, she mentioned.
By working with a monetary planner, retirees might get a “finer level” on their withdrawal methods, Benz mentioned. For instance, these plans might accommodate greater portfolio withdrawals if a retiree decides to delay claiming Social Safety advantages, she mentioned. As well as, knowledgeable may also create plans that maximize a retiree’s good years, Benz mentioned.
“It does not should be an all-in, year-in, year-out relationship,” Benz mentioned. “However get a second set of eyes on this, and the planner can assist you with a spending plan.”
A monetary advisor would even be a very good place to start out relating to contemplating whether or not or to not buy an annuity, Warshawsky mentioned.
When to say Social Safety advantages
Warshawsky and Pang’s analysis additionally highlights one other technique: delaying Social Safety advantages to assist enhance retirement earnings. By bridging — or utilizing financial savings to cowl spending till the best Social Safety claiming age of 70 — retirees can improve their month-to-month checks, based on the analysis.
“Social Safety in its essence is a life annuity,” mentioned Warshawsky, who served as deputy commissioner for retirement and incapacity coverage on the Social Safety Administration from 2017 by 2021.
Social Safety’s looming belief fund depletion dates — when advantages could also be lowered throughout the board except Congress enacts adjustments to this system — have prompted some to say retirement advantages early, hoping they will not be affected if advantages are lower, Warshawsky mentioned. “However there is not any assure of that,” he mentioned.
Retirees who need the best degree of lifetime earnings ought to contemplate delaying Social Safety retirement advantages, based on Morningstar’s State of Retirement Earnings report. As well as, choosing a easy instant or deferred annuity may additionally assist amplify earnings, the report states.