Kash Patel, director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), throughout a Home Intelligence Committee listening to on worldwide threats in Washington, DC, US, on Thursday, March 19, 2026.
Daniel Heuer | Bloomberg | Getty Pictures
A Houston federal court docket decide on Tuesday dismissed a lawsuit by FBI Director Kash Patel alleging that former FBI official Frank Figliuzzi defamed him by saying Patel final yr had “been seen at nightclubs excess of he has been on the seventh flooring of” the bureau’s headquarters in Washington, D.C.
“The Court docket finds that Figliuzzi’s assertion is rhetorical hyperbole that can’t represent defamation,” U.S. District Court docket Choose George Hanks Jr. wrote in his determination. “Accordingly, Dir. Patel has didn’t state a declare in opposition to Figliuzzi, and his lawsuit should be dismissed.”
The dismissal got here a day after Patel filed an unrelated $250 million defamation lawsuit in D.C. federal court docket in opposition to The Atlantic journal over a new article that alleged he has abused alcohol.
Whereas ruling on the important thing query of defamation in Figliuzzi’s favor, the decide denied his request that he be awarded court docket prices and attorneys’ charges below Texas’ anti-SLAPP legislation. SLAPP is an acronym for Strategic Litigation Towards Public Participation.
Figluizzi’s lawyer, Marc Fuller, in a press release to CNBC, stated, “This can be a victory for press freedom and the First Modification.”
“Director Patel’s declare in opposition to Frank was baseless, and we’re happy that the court docket dismissed it,” Fuller stated.
Patel’s legal professionals didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.
Figliuzzi, former assistant director for counterintelligence on the FBI, made his crack about Patel on Could 2, 2025, on the MS Now present “Morning Joe.”
“Yeah, nicely, reportedly, he is been seen at nightclubs excess of he has been on the seventh flooring of the Hoover constructing,” stated Figliuzzi.
Patel sued him in June, accusing Figliuzzi of “fabricating a selected lie” in regards to the FBI due to Figliuzzi’s “clear animus” towards him.
As proof of that animus, Patel’s lawsuit referenced scathing statements about him by Figliuzzi, which questioned his competence and claimed that “his document exhibits no devotion to the Structure, however blind allegiance to [President Donald] Trump.”
“Since changing into Director of the FBI, Director Patel has not spent a single minute within a nightclub,” Patel’s go well with stated.
In his determination Tuesday, Hanks wrote that Figliuzzi’s nightclub jibe, “when taken in context, can’t have been perceived by an individual of odd intelligence as stating precise details about Patel.”
“An individual of affordable intelligence and studying wouldn’t have taken his assertion actually: that Dir. Patel has really spent extra hours bodily in a nightclub than he has spent bodily in his workplace constructing,” Hanks wrote.
“By saying that Patel spent ‘way more’ time at nightclubs than his workplace, Figliuzzi delivered his reply ‘in an exaggerated, provocative and amusing means,’ using rhetorical hyperbole,” the decide wrote.
